Survey One, August 1, 2012

* Question One

22 respondents.

My level of involvement is: No. responses Percentages
   
I read content occasionally. 10 45%
I use specific timelines for research. 4 18%
I have no involvement with the History Commons. 4 18%
I occasionally write content. 3 14%
I write and edit content. 1 5%
I frequently write content. 0 0%

Comments include:

“History Commons is a unique online resource that ought to show off its credentials better than it is doing now, so that it can attract more funders and supporters.”

“Invaluable source of historical information.”

“I guess I simply don’t have time for everything and improving my history knowledge is not at the top of my list right now.”

“It’s fantastic.”

“I usually collect information from timelines for research and add events here and there.”

* Question Two

22 respondents.

My level of involvement would
be higher if:		 No. responses Percentages
   
I had more time. 12 50%
The site was easier to use. 4 17%
There were timelines that match my interests. 3 13%
Didn't know about it until now,
but now that I know,
I'm interested in becoming involved.		 3 13%
I have no interest in being more involved. 2 8%

Multiple choices allowed.

Comments include:

“History Commons might consider the ‘link’ metaphor/technology widely used in social media as a beginner’s level for those who want to take active part in it the first time.”

“The site itself is great!!!!”

“None apply. Guess you could always add more timelines, but otherwise, the site is fine. :)”

“Very useful research tool. I highly recommend it.”

“An iPod app or even social app would spike the site’s presence on the web in my honest opinion. I usually access the site via my iPod Touch because I am constantly moving locations. If a mobile-designed page was created it would be a useful improvement. Nonetheless, I love the site to death.”

surveys

all surveys
 
survey one
level of involvement